Forums

[Penske_Account]

Originally posted by sebastian_dangerfield
I'm saying taking all the evidence that the WMD intell was cooked by Bush and his admin, yet still believing Bush did not lie, or at a minimum, actively maintain willful ignorance, makes the person who nevertheless believes Bush was honest in the way he took us into Iraq either an imbecile, delusional or suspending disbelief. You can pick which variety of idiot you think best suits you, but you're in one.

I dislike Bush supporters because you're shrill morons. You have to keep this sanctimonious pedestal for your boy. I voted for Bubba. I loved him. Best moderate republican we ever had. But he was a fucking dirty liar and a manipulator. They all are, and Bush is a screaming four star king liar/manipulator. Just admit he's as dirty as Bubba and we'll be done with this. But you can't do that. You have to make asinine distinctions between lies and manipulations, as though the legal code were the law of physics. You need therapy. You sound like some first year law student douchebag enamored with his new found knowledge. "The law is a vigorous document... why, its the very base of all of mankind... the bedrock of everything." Jesus, if things were only thaat fucking simple. Its a bunch of rules on paper, and its trashed, perverted and twisted in more circles than a Thai whore. And don't forget the persecution of Bubba was politically motivated. You've said that lying to avoid a political witch hunt is a graver sin than lying to drag a nation into war, an absurd argument. Pick a new God; law ain't what you want to praying to.

Lying where people die as a consequence, though technically not a lie under [insert Spanky's favorite legal text here], is certainly every bit as loathesome as lying under some code of rules.

Bush didn't lie. there were WMDs.