|
I'll Make It Simple, Slave
Quote:
Originally posted by sgtclub
Your premise is, well, just wrong. Bush had 5-6 reasons for going to Iraq from the start. And he expressed them on numerous occassions pre-war. In fact, the NYT actually ran a story in which they chastised him for having so many reasons instead of just one. All of this happended before Powell went to the UN. The justification was paired down to WMD leading up to Powell's presentation because it was thought to be the strongest argument and the one most appropriate for the audience.
So with the exception of the flypaper rationale, he has been singing the same tune for 3 years now.
|
Exactly. He's never had a legitimate reason. His handlers forced him into one (he does nothing based on what the NYTimes says) and now he's backpeddling to the 5/6 agin. Why? Because no one would have supported him had he offered the 5/6 original reasons. Again, you're offering more evidence that he's been lying/manipulating all along.
__________________
All is for the best in the best of all possible worlds.
|
