Quote:
Originally posted by SlaveNoMore
So Wilson repeatedly lies, the Bi-partisan commission calls him out on it, and then he sends them a letter claiming their assertions were wrong.
|
If you had an open mind about any of this and wanted to take the five minutes to read his letter, you would see that it's not like that. (For starters, he's not complaining about what "bi-partisan commission" said -- the hack job on him was the work of Senators Roberts, Bond, and Hatch, all Republicans, and it was immediately clear that they were taking him down for the most partisan of reasons.)
Slave, tell me how Karl Rove knew within a couple of days of Novak's original piece -- you know, when Rove was talking to reporters, according to his attorney -- that Wilson was a partisan hack? Was there anything besides the fact that he wrote an op-ed in the New York Times disagreeing with the administration, or is that enough in your book to justify the smearing of him and his wife that followed?
