LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 157
0 members and 157 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 07-19-2005, 05:45 PM   #4409
sgtclub
Serenity Now
 
sgtclub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Survivor Island
Posts: 7,007
breaking news: the doomsday clock ticks one minute closer to the apocalypse

Quote:
Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
I think your facts are wrong. The Republicans tried to filibuster Fortas, and failed. There may have been some Dems joining them, but I would doubt it, since Fortas was a pal of LBJ's.
I'll have to check my facts

Quote:
Exactly. Did you miss Con Law? The fact that it's been done indicates that it's OK, unless you -- like Clarence Thomas -- don't believe in stare decisis. Which is a very strange thing for a "conservative" to say, since it's the polar opposite of conservatism. A respect for precedent, and for the fact that the filibuster has been around for a long time, would ordinarily lead "conservatives" to accept its constitutionality.
I understand that stare decisis applies to court decisions, but I didn't know it applies to actions prior to being challenged. This seems wrong to me. And I am not a conservative.
sgtclub is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:15 AM.