Quote:
Originally posted by Penske_Account
I think my rght to privacy ends where it actively infringes on someone's right to quiet enjoyment of their same such right.
Drug use in the home by a consenting adult; sex acts in private between consenting adults...okay. Drug/alcohol abuse that endangers the life of an unborn child when pregnant? Haven't we said as a society that this is something that is not part of that right? I think I am okay with that......[slippery slope]killing an unborn child because its inconvenient???[/slippery slope]
I am not sure that is hypocritical. I might like to kill some people (or at least run them out of town-hi RT!)because they are inconvenient too but my rights don't extend that far. either.
|
Well, this is where we split. The gordian knot. Me... I tend to like the women I know. And that tends to compel me to value them above the rights of whatever might be groing in them. Call that callous, but the line has to be drawn somewhere. And I come down as pro-woman. Thats really what we're talking about here, isn't it? The way this issue has been drawn, one is either pro-woman or pro-unborn.
We should start using those terms. It'd keep a lot of hyopcrites from getting laid. Try to explain how you're "pro-unborn" while you're trying to get in any self respecting progressive woman's pants.
PS: My indpendent research, conducted over nearly two decades of trying to get in women's pants, indicates that the women who call themselves pro-life are not the women one wants to fuck.
