LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 377
0 members and 377 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 07-20-2005, 01:16 PM   #4586
Penske_Account
WacKtose Intolerant
 
Penske_Account's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: PenskeWorld
Posts: 11,627
Here it comes...

Quote:
Originally posted by sebastian_dangerfield
Taking your position necessarily values one life over the other. You’re forcing one life to suffer because you value another’s rights more. Its real simple, and I don’t know why you fight me on my accurate characterization of your position. To clarify:

Me - The woman’s rights trump the fetus’ until the fetus is viable (very viable, as in late 2d trimester) outside the womb.

You - The fetus’ rights trump the woman’s after three months.
And if I find that a six month old born baby causes my life to suffer why does the state force me to bear that burden thus trumping my rights to the liberty and the pursuit of happiness...why can't I just humanely dehydrate it to death (the most humane form of death according to the liberals)?
__________________
Since I'm a righteous man, I don't eat ham;
I wish more people was alive like me



Penske_Account is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:50 PM.