LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 961
0 members and 961 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 04:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 07-20-2005, 01:27 PM   #4608
sebastian_dangerfield
Moderator
 
sebastian_dangerfield's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Monty Capuletti's gazebo
Posts: 26,231
RESPOND SEBBY

Quote:
Originally posted by ltl/fb
It's a wonderful "works great in theory, sorta" thing he and DS blather on about. And possibly Less. Something about the guy contractually opting out of responsibility for any child that results from sex he has.

I look forward to this discussion.
Nonsense. Contracts that violate public policy/seek to violate state law can't be enforced.

I favor a statute which forces the man doing the fucking to suffer as much as the knocked up woman. You can't write a contract to subvert a statute.

No opt out. You stick it in; you bear the consequences. Every last stinking late nite without sleep and dirty diaper's worth of them. Every college tuition payment and ride to and from little league. Every loss of promotion and every missed social event. You live it all, Mr. Reckless Dick, every goddamned shitty inch of it. Caveat fucking emptor.
__________________
All is for the best in the best of all possible worlds.
sebastian_dangerfield is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:21 PM.