LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 1,511
0 members and 1,511 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 04:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 07-20-2005, 04:09 PM   #4691
Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)
Moderator
 
Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Pop goes the chupacabra
Posts: 18,532
Here it comes...

Quote:
Originally posted by SEC_Chick
The sources I have read put the miscarriage rate of normal babies between 1/100 and 1/400 for amnio, depending on the study, but averaging out to about 1/200 or 250, and is slightly higher for CVS (CVS also measuraby increasing risk for club foot and other limb deformities). Given that at my age, the risk of Downs is only about 1/1000 or so, it does not make sense to have it. We very likely will do the non-invasive screens, to prepare for possible circumstances.
See, this is the analysis docs will give, nononono.

But if the negative value of a downs baby is 4x the negative value of a miscarriage, one should go with amnio. Yet docs are afraid to even suggest that calculus.
Mmmm, Burger (C.J.) is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:36 PM.