LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 1,995
0 members and 1,995 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 08-10-2005, 01:30 PM   #908
Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)
Moderator
 
Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Pop goes the chupacabra
Posts: 18,532
CAFTA

Quote:
Originally posted by Spanky
. . . And cutting tariffs are good for us. Cutting tariffs are not something we give away to get something else. Cutting them is good for us. . . .
1) True, but they are a bargaining chip.
2) What is good for "us" is not necessarily good for the relevant organized political constituencies.

Quote:
. . . Either way the labor and environmental standards having nothing to do with free trade. You may think they do by your tortured analysis of a level playing field but they are a side issue.
Intellectually they do not. Politically they do. The giant sucking sound is still heard in union halls throughout the US.

Quote:
Like I said, business knows what is best for business. And if they want tariff reductions and don't care about your level playing field I would tend to think that if we are trying to do what is good for business we should listen to them. Doesn't that make sense.
Yes, but it's a truism. Businesses want tariff reductions only when it helps them. Sometimes tariffs help them, which is why the anti-dumping laws continue to exist and are regularly invoked.
Mmmm, Burger (C.J.) is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:43 AM.