Quote:
Originally posted by Penske_Account
Read the words. He said in effect Saddam was so dangerous, including posing a WMD threat to us, that he needed to be removed. The fact that Clinton could give such a speech and then not act on it is just another testament to his deriliction of duty. Not unlike his dereliction of duty in failing to respond to WTC I or any of bin Laden's other attacks and then turning down opportunties to take custody of him.
The fact that Bush has acted to take on all the challenges Clinton failed to lead on, all of which were exacerbated by Clinton's failures, is a tribute to W's decisive leadership. Thankfully he has faith in what is right and will see us threw this period despite the attempts of the left to destroy him in the name of the insurgency.
|
I asked you about Bush's mistake -- of judgment, I would say, but you call it a question of faith here -- and, tellingly, you'd rather talk about Clinton. Who gives a fuck? Bush went to war because he thought -- or he said -- Hussein posed a threat to us, and he was wrong. Very, very wrong.