LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 112
0 members and 112 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 04:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 08-23-2005, 10:18 PM   #5
Hank Chinaski
Proud Holder-Post 200,000
 
Hank Chinaski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Corner Office
Posts: 86,149
Quote:
Originally posted by ltl/fb
oh stop being disingenuous. The only explanation of why this is even a Story is that this is a much greater proportion of the female student body that is pregnant than had been in years past. Obviously more students are having sex without effective birth control (which could mean more students are having sex, but the proportion using effective birth control has remained the same, or the same number of students are having sex, but they are no longer using effective birth control, or a combo of the two). Since pregnancy causes people to drop out of school, and can be unhealthy when the Girl's body is still fairly immature, the School quite rightly wants to see what they can do to further educational goals.

That's like someone analyzing the Baby boom and you saying more people got pregnant by having the sex, that's all, why look behind it.

Your analytical Skills leave much to be desired.

And the prurience, sadly, is predictable.

I find myself respecting club far more than Spanky. Scary.
Maybe someone is trying to loosen up and make a little sexual inuendo post. You have to attack every early effort?
__________________
I will not suffer a fool- but I do seem to read a lot of their posts
Hank Chinaski is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:00 PM.