Quote:
Originally posted by Replaced_Texan
Speaking of Iraq, I don't know why I'm so upset that we liberated a country to set up a quasi-theocracy, but it bugs me nonetheless. I should have known that this would happen, though. The administration wants to do the same goddamned thing here, except our constitution gets in the way.
|
It is statments like these that I find baffling. A complaint without a point is about as useful as pissing into the wind.
Every policy decision has negative and positive consequences. The decision that is chosen should beone where the positives outweigh the negatives.
Do you think the Bush administratio likes the fact that the Iraqi constitution is quasi-theocratic?
So what do we do, override the democratically elected assebly? Hand them a constitution?
Do you think Iraq would be better of with Saddam in power? If you think Iraq would be better off with Saddam in power then say it.
Unless you have some idea of what policy should be implemented that will make the overall situation better, what is the point of pointing out the negative aspects, as if we were not already aware of it.
