Quote:
Originally posted by Spanky
You guys just won't say it will you. Why don't you just say it "Iraq and the United States would be better off if Saddam Hussein was still in power opressing, torturing and killing his people. Therefore the invasion was a mistake."
You critisize the invasion all day, but don't have the nads to state what you really mean. Or is because you don't really now what you believe you just like to critisize Bush.
|
I have the nads to say it. Iraq and the United States would be better off if Saddam Hussein was still in power opressing, torturing and killing his people. Had we not wasted pissloads of money turning a secular dictatorship into a fucking theocracy in the making, we could deal with actually taking out AQ in the Pakistani provinces and laying the heat on the Saudis full bore.
And shut the fuck up about the torture and killing Hussein did, will ya? Jesus Fucking Christ. Could you pick a weaker fucking argument? We killed more Iraqis in our invasion and the subsequent insurgency our half assed reconstruction caused than Hussein would've killed in 2 more decades in power. That "We saved so many live!" argument is such a steaming pile of horseshit. We saved a whole lots people? Really? How? By killing a shitload of them? Run the numbers in any direction you can pervert them... had Hussein stayed in power, he'd have probably lived another ten or so years, and killed a fraction of what we killed "freeing people" into a new living hell of Islamic statehood.
Pick something other than a non-starter argument next time. You've been pitching that tired iron around for a long time and nobody's flagged you for it. Consider yourself flagged. Time to pick a new justification.
