Just a few snippets while I ignore the rest of your post.
Quote:
Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
Combine that with the possibility that Iraq would have/ could have given them chemical weapons and you have 1000s more dead. That justified attacking Iraq.
|
Not good enough. We have thousands more dead right now -- and no indication that the current threat is reduced as a result. We have cloudy prospects _at best_ for future threat reduction as a result.
Quote:
|
However, I believe that some of the arguments used by the Dems politicians to generate dis-satisfaction with Bush are harmful to the Country, and when a politician harms my country to try and generate some desparate sliver of political gain, that gets close to treason.
|
See, if you substitute "GOP" for "Dem" and "support" for "dissatisfaction" -- that precisely describes what I think Bush and his supporters have done. This is why the argument is essentially irreconcilable -- and we'll have to keep chewing on each other until we are exhausted-- and only time will tell who (me) was right.
Quote:
|
And guess what? the . . . . anti-Jew chunk of your party is sizable.
|
True, but this from a Republican?
S_A_M
