Quote:
Originally posted by ironweed
This is another case of Hank's poor drafting causing unecessary confusion. I understood his post to dispute the existence of the phenomenon of global warming -- not deny GWB's personal culpability for the situation, which is an issue we can discuss later. But when you assume Hank means what he types in his increasingly erratic and confused contributions you make an ass out of you and umption.
|
The same way you can't decipher my posts you wouldn't understand the underlying evidence for/against global warming. I understand both, that's why I'm always happy to explain either to youse guys. See? 189-5
