|
NOLA
Quote:
Originally posted by notcasesensitive
ETA: Now that is see your above post, I guess I know your position. I find it sad, but so be it. I don't think people were saying do this instead of worrying about the people, but if you don't care about helping all these people's former pets, so be it.
|
It's a resource allocation issue. Of course, people are within their rights to use their resources wherever they want to. Enough Americans do nothing for charity (our charity giving rates are among the lowest in the first world) anyway, so I am happy with whatever they do. I'm just shocked that people, seeing massive suffering of humans and animals, choose to use their resources to make the lives of the animals better. It is incomprehensible to me. That is me. If the alternative is that people do nothing, I guess these people addressing the needs of suffering animals relieves that burden on other charities and governmental agencies.
__________________
"I say that nobody here , other than yourself and possibly Sidd, would masturbate to thoughts even remotely associated with you, because you come across like someone who is generally ignored in real life, yet feels that he shouldn't be because of his obvious way with words,overall sense of fun, enlightened attitude, and vigorous driving skills."
|
