Quote:
Originally posted by sebastian_dangerfield
You have yet to offer a single cite to evidence supporting your non-dumbassery. Ty is observing the Marquis of Lawtalkers Rules. He raised raised an allegation - you are a dumbass. Until you refute that assertion with solid evidence, you are assumed a dumbass. You risk a default judgment of dumbassery with these frivolous motions to dismiss. The Court does not recognize Mr. Penn’s dumbassery as either precedential or relevant.
|
Guilty until proven innocent? Does he have to provide any evidence to support his allegation? I don't understand the charges levelled against me. What exactly is a dumbass?
