Quote:
Originally posted by sebastian_dangerfield
You have yet to offer a single cite to evidence supporting your non-dumbassery. Ty is observing the Marquis of Lawtalkers Rules. He raised raised an allegation - you are a dumbass. Until you refute that assertion with solid evidence, you are assumed a dumbass. You risk a default judgment of dumbassery with these frivolous motions to dismiss. The Court does not recognize Mr. Penn’s dumbassery as either precedential or relevant.
|
As the preeminent board expert on nuts, I'd just like to say Spanky is Nuts. And, as Spanky has repeatedly demonstrated, once an authority has spoken, well, you can just write it down. See, e.g., Spanky for Dummies, p. 69.
I leave to the rest of you whether this is relevant or not to the question of Spanky's dumbassery.
