LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 3,758
0 members and 3,758 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 12,534, 02-14-2026 at 03:04 PM.
View Single Post
Old 09-06-2005, 06:24 PM   #3799
Gattigap
Southern charmer
 
Gattigap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: At the Great Altar of Passive Entertainment
Posts: 7,033
Tomorrow's newspapers today

Quote:
Originally posted by Penske_Account

quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by Gattigap
The feds are responsible, the state and local, we are looking into it.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
If you choose to do what can only be called paraphrasing at its most charitable, please bracket it. Otherwise people might get pissed at you for badly mischaracterizing what they took time to write, and stop taking you seriously at all.


Quote:
Again you qualify the one and unqualifiedly critisise the other.
Good lord. I offered to have them shot.

Quote:
You stick your hand in the sand as to info regarding state and local that has been out there for a week and claim, we are just finding out about it, which is nonsense.
You should read what I wrote.

Quote:
As soon as the Feds didn't solve the problem you were all over Bush without an iota of benefit of the doubt or looking at the totality of the circumstances.
You're right. For example, on second thought, I should've realized that the Arabian horse trader-cum-director of FEMA should be given some latitude with the facts on the ground reported by every fucking news outlet on the planet 24 hours prior.

Quote:
And you still refuse to explain how the first responders are less responsible than the Feds and specifically how the local is not so much more at fault for the failure to implement a plan that existed that set the Feds up to come into a situation which was a disaster to start with.
Nice compound sentence, but it lacks ..... something. We need to transmogrify this point into something larger, something that fits with our larger worldview. Something .. Bushian. Can we work in something dimocratic? Something -- dare I say it? -- with national electoral consequences?


Quote:
Citing Ty and Not Bob et al does not make it anymore convincing. Every liberal I meet or know has their heads as far in the sand as y'all. And none of you can figure out how a coutnry would vote for Bush. Twice. Surprise surprise.
Attaboy. Blast off! Wheeeeeeee!
__________________
I'm done with nonsense here. --- H. Chinaski
Gattigap is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:06 PM.