LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 756
0 members and 756 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, Yesterday at 04:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 09-16-2005, 03:07 PM   #249
Spanky
For what it's worth
 
Spanky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: With Thumper
Posts: 6,793
Absurdity

Quote:
Originally posted by taxwonk

Second, the defendant who is convicted and sentenced to die doesn't have much use for money damages.
What you are forgetting is that the defendant is guilty. There was more probative evidence in his trial which led to the truth. Why is he getting screwed? The purpose of the rule is not to let guilty people go free, that is just an unintended consequence. Better he die and the money go to his heirs.
Spanky is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:31 PM.