LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 130
0 members and 130 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 09-22-2005, 04:25 PM   #649
Spanky
For what it's worth
 
Spanky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: With Thumper
Posts: 6,793
Delay = RINO

Quote:
Originally posted by Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)
And Bush doesn't have to veto anything for the same reason.

(whatever happened to the line-item veto?)

I'm not sure your reason is quite right, because it "proves too much". One could explain any bad law by the same rationale. With spending, if it's pork, that will get them more votes not less. If it's not pork, they can blame the wasteful spending on 534 other people, not themselves.
We are trying right now to pass redistricting in California. Iowa has had redistricting reform and I think the statistic was that three out of five of its congressional seats were competitive. In California, where we don't have redistricting reform, we only had one competitive seat out of 52.

both Nancy Pelosi and Tom Delay are against the California Redistricting reform so you know it is a good idea.
Spanky is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:38 AM.