Quote:
Originally posted by Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)
Particularly right. Her basic claim was that he had promised to give her a substantial chunk of his main trust, which he did not do. Claims based on his will wouldn't get her much.
|
First off, the yahoo story says she began her battle before he even died. Was he any more incapacaitated when she began her battle than the eight months before when they got married? If so, shouldnt that nullify her claim in the first place? And if not, shouldnt that be proof, on its face, that he did not intend for her to have the money if she was fighting when he was still able to step in? Why woldnt she get it in wrirint if he was still alive? Doesnt add up.
Is the douchbag son arguing Undue Influence or whatever that argument is when someone cant think straight bc they have tits the size of a skull smothering their face and they cant escape bc they are bound to either a bed or a wheelchair?
From a state probate level, how does she have a case? And how did this get kicked to a ninth circuit bankruptcy court? Totally different case? She claimed bankruptcy and somehow brought this old rich guy thing in to that case? What happened here exactly?
