LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 138
0 members and 138 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 09-30-2005, 02:00 PM   #1254
Captain
Sir!
 
Captain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Pulps
Posts: 413
Roberts is in

Quote:
Originally posted by Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)
I don't think the Contracts clause gets you much of anywhere for substantive due process. That's focused on ex post changes to teh terms of contracts, not ex ante limitations upon them.

Now, the privileges and immunities clause both in Art. IV and the 14th amendment should get your somewhere, but, since slaughterhouse and Parrish, don't.
I think someone defending Lochner might also be willing to interpret the contracts clause in a pre-1950s manner. I believe the first decision that made clear the contracts clause was focused on ex post changes was Ogden v. Saunders, after the New Deal changes in outlook.
Captain is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:44 AM.