LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 127
0 members and 127 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 10-05-2005, 04:51 PM   #1815
Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)
Moderator
 
Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Pop goes the chupacabra
Posts: 18,532
Calling Penske Out

Quote:
Originally posted by Replaced_Texan
I think it had to do with the fact that the insurance companies aren't getting the data, since the fines are civil, not criminal, (Texas ACLU blogger, Grits for Breakfast, has some analysis on contesting the tickets on that basis (if you follow his links, you'll see a lot more discussion on the cameras)), so it does them no good in analyzing who might be a dangerous driver.
That's a pretty sorry equal protection argument. There are plenty of things we have both criminal and civil penalties for. Also, the "safer to run it in the conditions" argument is pretty weak, given that means the speed was unsafe.

That said, it raises a very fair point that it eliminates any discretion and contextual assessment. I have related elsewhere (under a sock) my story about speeding cameras in DC. Suffice to say the protest mechanism does not take into account circumstances that would ordinarily call for a police escort rather than a speeding ticket. (Nor, I'm told does it ever take into account any excuses--it's a rubber-stamp rejection of your appeal. But that's the due process issue, not the ticket in the first place).
Mmmm, Burger (C.J.) is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:52 AM.