Quote:
Originally posted by Sidd Finch
Yep. You do. All the time.
|
Ding. Cite please. I just question why moral compasses are awry. Murder and rape are wrong, despite Wonk's self-proclaimed checkmate.
Quote:
Originally posted by Sidd Finch
Gosh. We're so proud. You only posted that picture once today!
|
That was the first time I ever posted that photo. You should be happy. A 1000 new words for racist hypocrate oppressor. I am expanding everyone's language capabilities.
Quote:
Originally posted by Sidd Finch
So, although I think Byrd is a piece of shit, I am not allowed to say anything about Bennett, because, well, Byrd.
|
I am not sure I knew you felt that way about Byrd, although I welcome the admission. And I didn't say you weren't allowed to say anything, but I think it better to focus on substance and not form.
Quote:
Originally posted by Sidd Finch
I'll be sure to vote against Byrd next time around.
|
Well that is at least heartening. Perhaps we made progress here today. Of course, I am not sure if Balt advanced at all, since he is ignoring me.
Quote:
Originally posted by Sidd Finch
Okay, now I also need to reform a bunch of police depts -- in Dem cities only, of course, because we know that while all Dems (sorry, Dims) are racist, we know from the Gospel of Penske that no Repubs are -- before I can say "Bennett is an asshole." Got it.
The prior restraints that you bitch about are perfectly appropriate when applied to "Dims", I suppose.
|
Most big cities are controlled by the Dimwitted party, if not completely, then effectively (while NYC may have a Republican mayor, he's more aligned with the D party and the rest of city is in Demo hands). And again while I am not for prior restraint, talk away, I would go for substance over form. As for Bennet, we know the liberals are going to hate on them, he called out their boy Clinton, but he is irrelevant to any public policy in the US. He's a private citisen. A political talking head for $$$, i.e an entertainer, albeit more intelligent than Admiral Penn.
Quote:
Originally posted by Sidd Finch
He managed to change the charts every once in awhile. And he managed to use them to further discussion, not to shut it down.
|
You are the one who wanted to keep talking, how did I shut you down?
Quote:
Originally posted by Sidd Finch
Once again, are you even willing to consider the possibility that maybe the problem is the way you express yourself, and not the supposed failure of several people to understand you?
|
Obviously I considered it, it would be impossible to have this back and forth without considering it, but I have made my position clear on the areas where there is discrepancy. If you want to continue to read more into my words than is there, I can't stop you. If you want to continue to feel slighted by harsh rhetorical criticism of Kleagle Byrd or Chappaquiddick Teddy I don't know how to stop your delusional grandiosity, other than to suggest medication. You are not a Senator, I don't think you are a Kennedy cousin, you are not a DNC power broker, I don't think. I really don't even criticise people who can vote for, other than an occassional criticism of Boxer, but I think any rightminded soul can agree she is a shrill hag. No offence. Although that doesnt mean you are a shrill hag. You are certainly not a hag. Definitely. Not.
