LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 123
0 members and 123 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 10-13-2005, 02:45 PM   #3061
Diane_Keaton
Registered User
 
Diane_Keaton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: In Spheres, Scissoring Heather Locklear
Posts: 1,687
The Not-Ready-for-Prime-Time Party

Quote:
Originally posted by sebastian_dangerfield
I disagree. The definition of a liberal is one who is in favor of less regulation. Its been twisted sideways by the assholes who think govt interference is a form of liberty, but the definitions of "liberal" are (from Google):

# broad: showing or characterized by broad-mindedness; "a broad political stance"; "generous and broad sympathies"; "a liberal newspaper"; "tolerant of his opponent's opinions"
# having political or social views favoring reform and progress
# tolerant of change; not bound by authoritarianism, orthodoxy, or tradition
# a person who favors a political philosophy of progress and reform and the protection of civil liberties
# big: given or giving freely; "was a big tipper"; "the bounteous goodness of God"; "bountiful compliments"; "a freehanded host"; "a handsome allowance"; "Saturday's child is loving and giving"; "a liberal backer of the arts"; "a munificent gift"; "her fond and openhanded grandfather"
# a person who favors an economic theory of laissez-faire and self-regulating markets
# free: not literal; "a loose interpretation of what she had been told"; "a free translation of the poem"

I don't see anything there that says "favoring govt interference."
Yes you do. It's in the 5th definition in that a liberal would require government to be fond openhanded grandfathers with my goddamn money.
Diane_Keaton is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:11 AM.