LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 141
0 members and 141 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 11-01-2005, 04:31 PM   #4361
Penske_Account
WacKtose Intolerant
 
Penske_Account's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: PenskeWorld
Posts: 11,627
Bring it on Dimwits!

Quote:
Originally posted by Gattigap
If you want more Scalias and Thomases on the Court, vote Republican. If you don't, and it's important to you, then you'd better not.
It's embarassing that lawyers would attempt to dumb down the argument into some type of scare tactic related to Scalia or Thomas. Scalia is one of the great intellectual minds and jurists of his generation and our time and properly sits on the SCotUS. The same might be able to be said for Ginsburg. They represent different judicial and constitutional philosphies but neither's ideology outweighs their credentials.

While the name Alito could replace Scalia in the above sentence, they are not the same person. Alito is not qualified because he is a carbon copy of Scalia, he is qualified because of his intellect and accomplishments. It's an insult to him, SCalia and the Court to insinuate otherwise. Also, it borders on the whole "Scalito" term, and as such, the typical racist bias of the left wing. Congrats on chugging the kool-aide.


Quote:
Originally posted by Gattigap
that this post closely trails your advocacy piece cheering Roe no longer being law of the land, right?
yes. Once Roe is gone, the states will be more free to regulate partial birth abortion, and require parental consent and notification. Which the American people, except the out of touch looney left, support.
__________________
Since I'm a righteous man, I don't eat ham;
I wish more people was alive like me




Last edited by Penske_Account; 11-01-2005 at 04:33 PM..
Penske_Account is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:16 PM.