Quote:
Originally posted by ThrashersFan
Okay, so there was this PhD chick on O'Reilly last night who said that cybersex is cheating. Now, I have never understood how one gets off by typing things like "I have my mouth on your cock" to one another but to each his/her own I suppose and I can't see where it is cheating any more than having a crush on CZ-J or something. Oddly enough, the PhD chick seemed to be implying that even having a thought about sex not involving your mate was tantamount to cheating. This stuff goes beyond the "is a blow-job sex" debate and into a really weird place. I wonder if she would still consider it cheating if it turned out that a dude's cybersex partner was really a 50 year old fat bald guy rather than the "Marilyn Monroe look-alike" he thought he as chatting with. Does anyone here agree with the PhD chick?
|
in the bible it says that if you lust after someone you commit adultry in your heart. personally, this seems like kind of an idiotic strategy if taken literally for a religion to adopt - because if you have already sinned and committed adultry in your heart by lusting after someone, you might as well have sex with them, but that is what the bible said so many fundamentalist christians believe that if you lust after someone you commit adultry in your heart. they kind of ignore the context that it was when Jesus stopped the pharasies from stoning a woman to death for adultry by saying "let he who is without this sin, cast the first stone" so that the lust in your heart thing was really about not judging other people not literally that lusting in your heart equals adultry.
where exactly did she get her ph.d? i'm guessing one of those fundamentalist christian universities like bob jones university or liberty university? because her position as you describe it is really a fundamentalist christian position. almost anyone other than a fundamentalist chirstian sees a real difference between merely lusting after someone and having sex with them.
