LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 906
0 members and 906 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 04:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 12-22-2005, 01:56 PM   #2259
Hank Chinaski
Proud Holder-Post 200,000
 
Hank Chinaski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Corner Office
Posts: 86,147
No surprize here but I am confused again.....

Quote:
Originally posted by Captain
And on the warrants, the fact that such a low threshold was not met strikes me as simply incredibly stupid and irresponsible.
that was sort of my point. it seems dumb that they didn't get a warrent in all situations- and they did get thousands. as I said previously, things must make sense to me. why would they not have done so in these few cases? That really is the heart of it, isn't it?
__________________
I will not suffer a fool- but I do seem to read a lot of their posts
Hank Chinaski is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:23 PM.