LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 2,893
0 members and 2,893 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 6,698, 04-04-2025 at 04:12 AM.
View Single Post
Old 02-08-2006, 10:00 PM   #3521
Diane_Keaton
Registered User
 
Diane_Keaton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: In Spheres, Scissoring Heather Locklear
Posts: 1,687
Have Fun, RT

Quote:
Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
Well, I was trying to point to differences in religious doctrine. I am a Christian. I actually go to church and shit. I wasn't offended by Serrano. I'm sure others were, but I'm not sure I understand the basis for their offense, other than that they felt disrespected and marginalized. That's a little different than a situation where the very act of depicting God (or G-d, as some of my MOT friends call him) is blasphemous.
The image of The Prophet was blasphemous to the religion of Islam. The image of Mary, Mother of God with elephant feces thrown all over it was blasphemous to religion(s) as well.



If there is a difference in how blasphemous one was as compared to the other, I don't think it's a meaningful one. Maybe you are viewing them as different because of how you view the relative positions of power of those blasphemed (Muslims: downtrodden, poor; Christians: less likely to be downtrodden, poor). I can respect a gut reaction or feeling, but....
__________________
"Before you criticize someone you should walk a mile in their shoes.That way, when you criticize someone you are a mile away from them.And you have their shoes."
Diane_Keaton is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:03 AM.