Quote:
Originally posted by Spanky
If anyone else besides Ty of SAM doesn't understand where the contradiction are please let me know.
|
If you're positing that the contention that "not blasphemous" under Christian doctrine equals "should not offend" Christians, then, with that assumption, the 4th statement is contradictory.
I would disagree with that (and I assume that Ty does too), but I understand the position--if a Christian takes offense at some insult (for lack of a better word) to some element of Christianity, it is, by definition, blasphemy. Thus, Ty saying it isn't blasphemous means he is also saying that other Christians should not take offense. Relies on a very broad definition of blasphemy.
