LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 530
0 members and 530 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, Yesterday at 04:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 02-10-2006, 04:27 PM   #3633
Tyrone Slothrop
Moderasaurus Rex
 
Tyrone Slothrop's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 33,076
InaniTy

Quote:
Originally posted by Cletus Miller
If you're positing that the contention that "not blasphemous" under Christian doctrine equals "should not offend" Christians, then, with that assumption, the 4th statement is contradictory.
Of course, you can only posit that if you assume that I didn't mean anything at all when I refered to Christian doctrine. Alternatively, you might think that I meant something when I used those words, and that I was trying to draw a distinction concerning the nature of the offense.

I agree that if you don't bother reading some of my words, they may appear contradictory. Caveat emptor.
__________________
“It was fortunate that so few men acted according to moral principle, because it was so easy to get principles wrong, and a determined person acting on mistaken principles could really do some damage." - Larissa MacFarquhar
Tyrone Slothrop is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:40 AM.