LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 823
0 members and 823 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, Yesterday at 04:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 02-10-2006, 04:33 PM   #3635
Spanky
For what it's worth
 
Spanky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: With Thumper
Posts: 6,793
InaniTy

Quote:
Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
The first time that you said I contradicted myself, I had the courtesy to give you a substantive response. I regret that you can't be bothered to do the same.
This is pathetic. I simply quoted what you said. It is totally obvious why I think they are contradictory. I am going to cut them down to the essence. I am not changing what they say in any way, or changing their meaning.

Claim:

"I haven't said other Christians .....shouldn't be offended."

Prior statements:

"..but I'm not sure I understand the basis for their offense

"But it doesn't have to do with Christian doctrine, so far as I know. Want to cite chapter and verse to me?"


"Let's stick to Christianity. What makes that blasphemous?"

Does any one besided Ty not see the contradiction? Does anyone think the way I edited them changed their meaning nor mislead the reader as to their original meaning?
Spanky is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:02 AM.