LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 161
0 members and 161 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 04-07-2003, 06:05 PM   #1236
taxwonk
Wild Rumpus Facilitator
 
taxwonk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: In a teeny, tiny, little office
Posts: 14,167
Look at me, I'm a size Zero! Who needs clothes?

Quote:
Originally posted by robustpuppy
No, I meant fundamental appeal in a basic, primal sense; that Marilyn's vulnerability taps into, for some men, a protective urge, which may be mixed with sexual desire.

Like you, I don't think she was the single icon of beauty, just one icon (as in image, symbol, or emblem). Personally, I don't get it.

I'd rather be Lauren Bacall or Audrey Hepburn any day.
I'd take it one step further. Not only is there not just one icon or fundamental notion of beauty, there isn't a fundamental form.

I agree that I would probabaly find Liv Tyler more attractive than Mia in a lingerie photo spread, I would not either one out from under the covers. And I certainly wouldn't go attributing some inherent moral or social superiority to Liv based on her dress size.

They both have the same eyes, capable of being both innocent and alluring at the same time. And those are what I find myself drawn to to begin with.

I just find the whole obssession with size rEdiculous to begin with. Too much either way is unattractive.
taxwonk is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:27 PM.