Quote:
Originally posted by Spanky
Kalamazoo can elect to protect is citizens more than than the Federal government, but it cannot lessen the federal protections, nor can the federal government stop Kalamazoo from trying to give further protection to their citizens.
That pretty much sums it up doesn't it Sidd?
|
Why should 51% of the representative be able to tell Kalamazoo to have at least x level of protection, but 51% can't tell them to have more than x level of protection, particularly when provided x level of protection imposes costs on other people, namely those doing the protecting?
