yesterday's news. today's news is they're still going to try to make a case.
I don't get it. It started off sounding really awful, and not surprising that a bunch of drunk rich kids might do something like this. But then little tidbits started to leak out that made the story questionable (like the email). Now there's no DNA whatsoever? Yet there's evidence she was raped? How could the DA possible think he could put on a case against the frat boys?
I'm not saying she wasnt' raped. She may well have been. But if you have proof none of the lax guys did it, why isn't he saying where he is looking?
