LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 93
0 members and 93 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 04-12-2006, 10:34 AM   #251
Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)
Moderator
 
Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Pop goes the chupacabra
Posts: 18,532
Duke

Quote:
Originally posted by sebastian_dangerfield
Isn't there an allegation they used condoms? I don't get this case. Ostensibly, the raped woman would be able to ID the rapists, no? Is there any story about them wearing masks or other disguises during the act? The DA has some trump card here he's wisely not leaking.

Or they've fucked the case up and won't be able to get a prosecution and are desperately trying to put Humpty Dumpty back togeher again... My guess would be the former, but we are talking state officials here...
The DA is up for election in 3 weeks. He's being challenged. The district has fairly high percentage of minority voters. Why do you think he hasn't closed the case?

That said, closing the case and closing the investigtion of the lacrosse players could be separate. If she was in fact raped (my understanding is that there was evidence of a rape), then someone must have done it. And you at least have to investigate that.
__________________
[Dictated but not read]
Mmmm, Burger (C.J.) is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:30 AM.