LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 1,246
0 members and 1,246 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 04-28-2006, 03:15 PM   #615
taxwonk
Wild Rumpus Facilitator
 
taxwonk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: In a teeny, tiny, little office
Posts: 14,167
Oh boy.

Quote:
Originally posted by sgtclub
I've been thinking about this a lot lately. Let's say we move away from fossil fuels and towards the hybrid or electric model. Isn't that going to put a tremendous demand on non-fossil fuel electricity? It wasn't that long ago in CA that we were experiencing rolling electricity blackouts, and I have to believe that would only be exasperated.

So we shouldn't use fossil fuels and we shouldn't build new nuclear plants. How exactly are we going to meet our electricity needs?
Hydrogen cells work off of water. Their emissions are called "steam." Solar is too expensive and cumbersome to make the effort to power vehicles with it. However, anybodywho has ever had a solar calculator should be able to intuit that the technology can be made to work on a small scale. Maybe at $8/gallon, it will become cost-efficient to finally get serious with solar.

I don't think we're ever going to be able to comletely wean ourselves from hydrocarbons. But as the resource becomes more expensive (and more dangerous to obtain) we will see more applications of renewaable resource technology. And the majors will probably be at the forefront of bringing them to us.
__________________
Send in the evil clowns.
taxwonk is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:31 AM.