LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 159
0 members and 159 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 05-08-2006, 06:12 PM   #739
Hank Chinaski
Proud Holder-Post 200,000
 
Hank Chinaski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Corner Office
Posts: 86,149
Hello, bilmore

Quote:
Originally posted by ironweed
I thought that's what this guy did his analysis for:



If you think economics is a science, and you have a theory like "cutting taxes forces reduced government spending," and you test that theory by comparing tax cuts to government spending, and you control for the relevant variables (maybe he didn't?), and the results directly contradict your theory, don't you have a problem?

It's a different thing to say that politicians shouldn't spend like drunken sailors. But for quite a while now we've heard how politicians can spend like drunken sailors while still cutting taxes because cutting taxes reduces government spending generally -- FACT.
what if the Dow were approaching it's highest point ever, or at least "ever when people weren't spending billions for IPOs of companies that had never made a dime."
__________________
I will not suffer a fool- but I do seem to read a lot of their posts
Hank Chinaski is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:56 PM.