LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 99
0 members and 99 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 06-05-2006, 05:25 PM   #1015
Hank Chinaski
Proud Holder-Post 200,000
 
Hank Chinaski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Corner Office
Posts: 86,149
Quote:
Originally posted by baltassoc
Meh. Either way I'm assured that any inheritence I now get will be taxed, were as before it would not have been.

Thanks!

Oh yeah, unless I hold on to the asset, whereas before I had an incentive to sell and reinvest if I saw a better investment of my capital. I think it was that whole reduction-of-incentive-to-reinvest that was the whole point behind the reduction in the capital gains tax, right?

BTW, no one has yet answered my question from a couple of weeks ago as to why one part of the government is trying its hardest (according to its own rhetoric) to stoke the economy by increasing the money supply by reducing taxes (a/k/a "supply side economics") while another part of the government is trying its hardest to control inflation by reducing the money supply by increasing interest rates.

This positivist economics stuff would be a lot more convincing if it were consistent.
was it you or SHP who bet me 1 month of board support that we'd invade Syria by late 2005? Someone owes RT some $$
__________________
I will not suffer a fool- but I do seem to read a lot of their posts
Hank Chinaski is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:30 PM.