LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 112
0 members and 112 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 06-16-2006, 03:34 PM   #1272
sebastian_dangerfield
Moderator
 
sebastian_dangerfield's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Monty Capuletti's gazebo
Posts: 26,231
To shoot or not to shoot.

Quote:
Originally posted by SlaveNoMore
Bad facts for a test case.

They sought a warrant, and got it.
The warrant authorizing them to search for guns and drugs.
They got there - banged and burst - didn't wait for the guy to run out the back door.
Whoa Nelly!!!! - they found guns and drugs.
Now perp wants evidence suprressed.

Um, boo fucking hoo?
Hey, you like drugs. I like drugs. We all like drugs. This may be a bad test case, but whatever it is, that shitbag Alito bent over for the right wingers. Fuck him, and fuck that fat windbag Scalia, with his obnoxious statement that "people hurt by this can sue for civil rights violations." No. No they can't. because unless the police violate your rights DELIBERATELY, you can't win one of those cases.

This ain't "conservative" jurisprudence. This is fucking activist shit. And this is why the GOP is about to get its fucking balls cut off in four months.

Fuck the "comservative" hypocrites. A conservative believes in people's rights to be free of state interference, not the converse. Fuck you, Alito. Really, fuck you.
__________________
All is for the best in the best of all possible worlds.
sebastian_dangerfield is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:02 PM.