Quote:
Originally posted by Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)
You're stating what the law is, not what you think the law should be. If no 4th A. is so good for the foreign goose, why not the same for the domestic gander?
|
Is this a serious question? I think the benefits for not having the government, at its discretion, within the United States, listen to your phone calls or search your house are obvious. On the flip side, the US trying to enforce the constitution, or thinking that US. Constitutional protections should apply outside the US is, to me, also obviously absurd. Do you disagree? Do I really need to explain the benefits to one and the drawbacks of the other?
