Quote:
Originally posted by fair and balanced
Cite to an objective factual source, please?
|
My recollection is that the CIA determined as much, based on the fruits of the Kay Commission, or whatever it was called. (Obviously, any true conservaitve will dismiss the CIA as a partisan opponent of the President, unless it's saying something useful.) Do you really think that's incorrect? If so, do you think:
(a) Saddam destroyed them without telling anyone after Bush took office,
(b) Saddam moved them to Syria (or co-partners in evil Iran or North Korea) before the war, or
(c) They're still there, but very well hidden.
Whichever, cite to an objective factual source, please?
eta: For a more objective source than the CIA, how about
USA Today, which is so neutral it'll put you to sleep. This article suggests 41 deserves the credit, not 42.
