LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 96
0 members and 96 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 07-04-2006, 02:58 AM   #1611
Spanky
For what it's worth
 
Spanky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: With Thumper
Posts: 6,793
Who lied?

Quote:
Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
You and I both know this doesn't mean they get everything. Well, I know
it.
Whatever they got it was enough for them to address the American public that there is no question that Saddam had WMDs. They said that at the end of the Clintons administration and they went on saying it right up until the invasion. So if Bush lied, so did the Clinton administration and so did most of the Democrat and Republican leadership. Or the other option is that they all believe Saddam had WMDs.


Quote:
Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
If you say so. I think some of them were a little more calculating.
And you don't think Kerry and Sen. Clinton and Pelosi weren't trying to score points with their more conservative constitutents when they claimed Saddam still had WMDs and the administration should do something about it.


Quote:
Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
So Democrats are partisan when they criticize the President but principled and responsible when they support him. I think I understand how that works.
You really are intellectually dishonest. Just put words in my mouth and then critisize them. Your favorite strategy. Sometimes the Democrats are principled when they don't support Bush and are being political when they do (Flag burning amendment, Gay marriage amendment etc). Believe it or not, it depends on the situation. Candidate Bush was definitely playing politics when he critisized Clinton's policies in the Balkans and then continued them when he got in office. Everyone thought there were WMDs and most of the responsible Democrats supported the invasion. Some supported the president for political reasons, some out of principles and most out of a little of both. I am sure some were worried that Bush might find that Saddam was close to developing a nuclear weapon and they didn't want to look soft on national security. But they all thought he had WMDs. When it turned out there were no WMDs, it was a political opportunity the Democrats (whether they supported the war and thought there were WMDs or not) couldn't pass up. It is just pathetic that someone with a law degree can't see when people in his own party are playing politics.
Spanky is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:17 PM.