Quote:
Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
If the word "cite" meant "citation to admissible evidence" then you wouldn't often write something to the effect of "plaintiffs fail to cite any evidence for their proposition that...." You would just write, "plaintiffs fail to provide a cite for their proposition that." But we both know that wouldn't make any sense. What you mean is that the plaintiffs don't have admissible evidence, not that they don't have a cite.
|
I wouldn't say admissible evidence, I would say no evidence. You really are giving the other side's case a boost doing it your way. If it isn't admissible why would you raise it to the judge?
If you want to email your briefs to me I'll give you more constructive criticism
