Quote:
Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
I wouldn't say admissible evidence, I would say no evidence. You really are giving the other side's case a boost doing it your way. If it isn't admissible why would you raise it to the judge?
If you want to email your briefs to me I'll give you more constructive criticism
|
Hank and Sidd are right.
I can't fucking believe you've been arguing with Spanky for so long about whether something is a "cite." A bullshit cite is rarely cited and proves nothing.
Spanky's argument was that Hersh is a bullshit cite. I think you knew this. Agree or not, but don't bust his ass on bullshit.
After all, this is a Very Important Board reserved for Substantive Discussion.
S_A_M
