LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 889
0 members and 889 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 04:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 08-05-2003, 07:46 PM   #17066
str8outavannuys
I am beyond a rank!
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Glasgow, natch.
Posts: 2,807
men & women & women

Quote:
Originally posted by Shape Shifter
Really, is it more stupid to have a threeway? If the dude's gonna cheat, he may as well shoot the moon. Hell, the extra partner should be a mitigating factor - you know, he wouldn't have cheated but for the opportunity of a THREEWAY.

(I think the gentlemen of the jury, at least, may buy it)
Sadly, the only jury that really matters here is male-free.

That said, I agree with Shape Shifter. If you're going to do cheat, going for the 3-way increases the benefit side of the cost-benefit analysis. The only downside, I suppose, is that you potentially lose some deniability (he said/she said vs. he said/both of those sluts said) if you want to claim that the whole sordid affair never took place.

But as a leading pro-FMF supporter, I gotta give a little nod to Austin's friend, especially if he'd never had the chance before he got married. Sadly I'll have no such fallback.
str8outavannuys is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:52 PM.