LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 158
0 members and 158 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 08-09-2006, 07:28 PM   #3018
Penske_Account
WacKtose Intolerant
 
Penske_Account's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: PenskeWorld
Posts: 11,627
Say it ain't so, Joe

Quote:
Originally posted by Sidd Finch
Spanky -- since you are sane, and since you apparently need something to talk about, maybe you could comment on this. Do you advocate nuking Iran? Do you think that we have a realistic chance of targetting and eliminating Iran's nuclear capabilities and programs with a quick set of bombing raids? Do you think we could pull off another invasion?

Put more simply -- as I asked before --- do we have a military option in Iran?

No offence to Spanky, what difference does it make if he advocates it. The truth is our military already has it as a contingency plan. Your boy Seymour Hersh has reported on it. Ty probably has a link.

Sidd, why don't you weigh in, if the choice is tactical nukes on Iran before they can strike Tel Aviv, which would you choose? Did you read Bernard Lewis' article in yesterday's WSJ, where he details why MAD doesn't work with an Arab nuke? I don't think anyone but some of Ty's nutty blog pals could argue that he is a respected scholar on the ME. I have no problem advocating using tactical nukes on Iran before they get a bomb and drop it on Tel Aviv or sell it to Al Qaeda or Hezbollah.

Do you?
__________________
Since I'm a righteous man, I don't eat ham;
I wish more people was alive like me



Penske_Account is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:22 PM.