Quote:
Originally posted by Sidd Finch
Just curious to hear what he thinks (and to get him off the "courageous or stubborn... you decide!" discussion).
|
Okay, I can agree with that, It's obviously "courageous", but Ty can never admit to the truth.
No kidding, but per my last post, once they have the nukes it will be too late, so we can frame all sorts of permutations of grey as to what our choices and policies would, should, can be, but a year or two from now, when we wake one morning and instead of the towers falling we are watching a mushroom cloud over Tel Aviv it will be too late. Maybe there weren't WMDs, maybe our intel in Iraq was bad, maybe that was a hasty war, but in the present situation, it seems pretty clear what the party's intent is and indepdently it seems somewaht clear that they are moving perilously close to acheiving the instrumentality to carry out the intent. I think sitting and waiting and talking are going to buy us nothing but tragic results. Of a historical scope beyond 911.
