Quote:
Originally posted by Penske_Account
Because you won't unqiualifiedly denounce him for what he was, a murdering terrorist.
|
He was a murdering terrorist. I denounce him as such. Happy? I've never said anything to the contrary. Will you now admit you misconstrued what I was saying?
Quote:
|
And trhe Manson family saw Charles manson as a leader, so what?
|
If they had their own country, we would have to devise our foreign policy accordingly.
Quote:
|
He was a murderous terrorist and we should have refused to deal with him (as Bush eventually did., see it can be done!) and/or refuse to deal with his terrorist apparatus. If you would refuse the false legitimization of bon Laden as a leader (hypotehtically per my earleir questions) why do you confer the same on arafat?
|
Because I perceive it to be in the long-term interests of the United States to do so. Because I think the United States will be better off if there is peace in Israel and Palestine. Arafat, however flawed a vessel, was what there was to work with.
